SharePoint is a widely used document management system in construction, valued for collaboration, communication, and file storage. But it has real limitations when it comes to storing construction photos. This blog covers the problems that come up when using SharePoint folders for construction imagery, and looks at alternative solutions.
1. Limited Storage Capacity
SharePoint's storage capacity is finite and shared among all users. With construction projects generating a vast amount of photos daily, the allocated storage can quickly reach its limit. As a result, project teams may face the burden of purchasing additional storage or constantly managing files to make space for new images.
2. Poor Image Organisation
The traditional folder structure in SharePoint lacks the necessary flexibility for effective photo organisation. As construction projects involve numerous components, phases, and locations, creating folders for each scenario can lead to a convoluted and confusing structure. Finding specific photos becomes an arduous task, hampering productivity and decision-making processes.
3. Limited Search and Retrieval Options
SharePoint's search capabilities may not be optimised for finding specific photos efficiently. Without robust metadata or tagging features, locating relevant images among thousands of files can be time-consuming, affecting project timelines and overall efficiency.
4. Version Control Challenges
Version control is critical in construction projects, where changes happen frequently. Storing photos in SharePoint folders can lead to multiple versions of the same image scattered across various folders, making it challenging to track the most recent and accurate visuals.
5. Lack of Collaborative Features
Construction projects involve diverse teams working together, often across multiple locations. SharePoint's folder-based system doesn't support real collaboration on photos, which leads to misunderstandings, delays, and miscommunication.
6. Security and Access Concerns
Not all construction photos should be accessible to everyone in the organisation. SharePoint's folder-level permissions might not provide the necessary granularity to control access to sensitive images, raising security concerns.
7. Mobile Accessibility Limitations
Many construction professionals require access to project photos on the go, which can be challenging with SharePoint's folder-centric approach. Mobile accessibility may not be as user-friendly or efficient, limiting the real-time availability of vital visuals.
8. Limited File Size Support
Construction photos, especially high-resolution images or videos, can be quite large in size. SharePoint has certain limitations on the file size it can support, and uploading large media files may lead to compatibility issues or errors. This limitation can be particularly troublesome when dealing with extensive construction projects that generate substantial visual content.
9. Lack of Image Preview and Thumbnail Generation
SharePoint's default interface may not provide adequate image preview or thumbnail generation for construction photos stored in folders. Without visual cues, users may struggle to identify specific images quickly, leading to inefficiencies and delays when locating the right photos for decision-making or documentation purposes. Modern construction photo management approaches address exactly these challenges.
10. Time-Consuming Upload and Download Processes
Uploading and downloading construction photos in SharePoint can be time-consuming, especially when dealing with large batches of images or slow internet connections. Construction professionals who frequently need to access or share visual materials may find this slow process frustrating and impeding project workflows.
What are the Potential Solutions?
Implement a Digital Asset Management (DAM) System
Consider adopting a specialised DAM system that caters explicitly to managing large volumes of visual content. DAM systems provide advanced features like AI-powered tagging, facial recognition, and easy-to-use metadata management, greatly improving photo organisation and retrieval.
Cloud Storage Integration
Integrate cloud storage solutions like Google Drive or Dropbox with SharePoint to extend the storage capacity and enhance accessibility. This hybrid approach allows teams to store construction photos in more flexible and scalable environments.
Utilise Collaboration Tools
Collaboration tools like Sensat let your whole team access and share images easily, with real-time discussion and simplified photo sharing built into Sensat's interface.
Use construction technology that does it for you
Gather's Siteview automates construction photo management. Your site photos are automatically aligned with your site diary records and plotted on the map, following the kind of structured documentation approach modern construction projects need. That gives your whole team easy viewing, better collaboration, and clearer project visualisation, without the manual organising.
Conclusion
SharePoint works well for general document management, but its limits on storage capacity, image organisation, search, version control, collaboration, security, mobile access, file size, image previews, and upload/download speed make it a poor fit for construction photos. Specialised DAM systems or cloud storage integrations solve most of these problems.
Photos only help a claim if they sit on the same day's site diary. That is what Rosie reads against the contract.
Key Takeaways
- A photo in a SharePoint library without a date, a location and a diary line is a picture, not a record.
- Take it that day and attach it to the site diary entry. Do not file it on Friday.
- Rosie can read a captioned photo on a diary line. She cannot search last year's Shared Documents.
Gather turns your site diaries into commercial evidence and flags compensation events before the eight week time bar closes. Book 15 minutes and see it run against one of your own projects.
Book a 15 minute demo



.webp)




