2026 buyer's guide

Best Site Diary Software UK (2026 Guide)

An honest 2026 guide to the best site diary software for UK construction. Compare Site Diary, Sitemate, Novade, Raken, Fieldwire and Gather.

Site diary software is a tool that records what happened on a construction site each day, such as labour, plant, weather, progress, delays, and photos, in a single searchable system instead of a paper book or a Word file. The best tool for you turns on one question most buyers skip: do you need to record the day, or recover money from it?

That question sorts this whole market. Almost every site diary app is built to capture activity and produce a tidy daily report. Very few read what you captured and tell you a compensation event happened before the NEC clause 61.3 eight-week time bar closes. Both jobs matter. They are not the same product, and most teams only realise the gap during final account preparation, when the notice period has expired and the negotiating position has gone.

This guide compares the eight site diary tools UK contractors and client-side teams shortlist most often, judged on capture speed, evidence quality, reporting, AI, commercial awareness, UK fit, and pricing. Gather built this page and sells one of the tools on it, so we have been direct about where the others are stronger.

01

How We Ranked Them

Seven criteria, weighted toward what changes commercial outcomes on a UK job:

  • Speed of capture. How fast a site team can log a day from a phone, in the rain, with gloves on.
  • Evidence quality. Timestamped photos, location, weather, and records that survive a dispute.
  • Reporting. Automated, shareable daily reports without an evening of formatting.
  • AI capability. Whether AI just speeds up writing the diary, or actually reads it and tells you something you missed.
  • Commercial awareness. NEC compensation events, time bars, and revenue recovery, not just record keeping.
  • UK fit. British terminology, UK contract forms, and a team that answers the phone in UK hours.
  • Pricing posture. Per user, per project, freemium, or enterprise quote, and how transparent the vendor is.

This is not a fake "our tool wins everything" list. Most tools here are genuinely better than Gather at pure field capture breadth, and the page says so. Gather sits at number one on a clearly stated, commercial-recovery-weighted set of criteria, and the page tells the reader plainly when a simpler field-first tool is the better buy.

02

Quick Comparison

ToolBest forCapture speedEvidence qualityAICommercial awarenessUK fitPricing posture
GatherUK NEC and target-cost commercial teamsFast (5 min)Strong, claim-readyYes, AI QS agent reads the diaryHigh: CE detection and 8-week time barUK-native, rail heritagePer project
Site Diary (Script & Go)Simple, fast daily reportsFastStrong (photos, timestamps)None statedLow: records onlyGood, UK presenceTiered, quote-based
Sitemate / DashpivotCustomisable no-code formsFastStrongAI-assisted diary draftingLow: no NEC4Growing UK presence£20.52 to £66.42 per user per month
NovadeMulti-site field operationsFastStrongSeparate Novade AI SuiteLow: no NEC4APAC origin, UK siteFreemium, then quote
RakenDaily reports plus labour and productionFastStrongNone statedLow: no NEC4US origin, UK usageFree trial, then quote
Fieldwire (Hilti)Task and drawing managementMediumGoodNone statedLow: no NEC4UK pricing publishedAbout £29 to £69 per user per month
BuildPassAI voice-to-text diary captureVery fast (voice)GoodYes, voice diary and AI summariesLow: no NEC4AU origin, UK availableFrom quote, per project
Ed ControlsSnagging, defects and qualityMediumGood (drawing-linked)None statedLow: quality not commercialUK-focused, UK supportQuote-based

Pricing note: these vendors do not price the same way. Sitemate and Fieldwire publish per-user monthly rates. Novade runs a freemium model. Gather is priced per project, not per seat. Ask each vendor to normalise against your project count and user count before you compare the numbers.

03

The 8 Tools, In Detail

1Gather

Best for: UK contractors and client-side teams on NEC or target-cost contracts who want the diary to recover money, not just record the day.

If all you need is a tidy daily report, several tools further down this list do that well and cost less. Gather is for the team that suspects it is leaving money on the table through compensation events nobody logged in time.

Gather is an AI site diary and commercial record platform. Site teams capture the day in about five minutes. The difference is what happens next: an AI QS agent reads every entry the way a senior quantity surveyor would, and flags potential compensation events, delays, and disruption patterns before the clause 61.3 eight-week time bar expires.

Capture and evidence: fast mobile capture with timestamped photos, weather, and location, structured so the record substantiates a CE later. AI capability: genuine detection, not a writing assistant — around 40% more compensation events than manual diary review, and roughly 70% less diary admin. Commercial awareness: the moat — Gather connects activity to entitlement and tracks the eight-week clock. UK fit: built by quantity surveyors and contract experts, with rail and infrastructure heritage. Where it stops: not a general no-code forms builder or full project-management suite. Pricing posture: per project, not per seat.

Will built Gather after nearly losing £20 million on the North West Electrification Programme. The records existed. They were scattered across emails, spreadsheets, site vehicles, and a supervisor's notebook nobody could find, and by the time the team assembled the evidence, the commercial records position had evaporated. That is the gap Gather closes.

2Site Diary (Script & Go)

Best for: teams that want a simple, fast, reliable daily site report and nothing more complicated.

The clean, focused daily reporting app that ranks at the top of this search for good reason. It records timestamped field data, photos, and custom forms, then generates exportable daily reports and a live dashboard. More than 1,000 companies use it.

Where it wins: simplicity, on web, iOS, and Android. Where it stops: no AI to read the record, no awareness of NEC compensation events or time bars. A capture tool, not a recovery tool. Pricing posture: tiered with a free trial, exact rates quoted on request.

3Sitemate / Dashpivot

Best for: teams that want to digitise a wide range of paper forms with a flexible no-code builder.

A no-code documentation platform positioned as "the Atlassian for the built world." Its strongest card is breadth: 100+ templates and a form builder. The site diary product now advertises AI-assisted diary creation.

Where it wins: template flexibility and a strong mobile app. Where it stops: AI helps write the diary, it does not detect commercial events. No NEC4 understanding. Pricing posture: published per-user rates from £20.52 to £66.42 per user per month on a one-year term, with enterprise pricing above 150 employees.

4Novade

Best for: larger operations running many sites that want field documentation and workflows centralised.

A field operations platform with a capable site diary at its core. Captures timestamped photos and progress data, auto-generates PDF/Excel reports, centralises documentation across multiple worksites. A separate Novade AI Suite is offered alongside.

Where it wins: multi-site scale and automated reporting. Where it stops: no NEC4 or compensation-event intelligence; APAC-origin rather than UK contract practice. Pricing posture: freemium, free for up to five users and five projects, quoted above that.

5Raken

Best for: teams that want a strong daily report plus labour and production tracking in one place.

A field management platform built around the daily report. Crews add notes, photos, and video on mobile, syncing to a web portal that produces shareable PDF reports. Adds time and production tracking, safety and quality checklists, and equipment tracking.

Where it wins: the daily report plus labour and production data, high field adoption. Where it stops: no AI layer, no NEC4 or commercial-recovery awareness. US-origin. Pricing posture: free trial, then quote-based.

6Fieldwire (Hilti)

Best for: teams whose main need is task and drawing management, with daily reports attached.

Now owned by Hilti, strongest on task management and drawing markup. Generates daily and weekly PDF reports, including 360-degree photos and video, and digitises forms such as daily reports and RFIs.

Where it wins: drawing markup, punch lists, and task coordination. Where it stops: the diary is one feature inside a task tool. No AI diary review, no NEC4 or commercial-event detection. Pricing posture: published UK per-user rates, roughly £29 to £69 per user per month depending on plan.

7BuildPass

Best for: teams that want the fastest possible capture through AI voice notes.

A construction management platform with a genuinely useful AI angle on the diary. Record a voice note while walking the site and it converts to a written description. Site attendance and weather pull in automatically, and an AI daily log summary tool condenses entries across a date range.

Where it wins: capture speed — voice-to-text and auto-summary make the diary almost effortless. Where it stops: the AI writes and summarises, it does not assess entitlement. No NEC4 compensation-event detection or time-bar tracking. Australian in origin. Pricing posture: quote-based, positioned as per project rather than revenue-based fees.

8Ed Controls

Best for: teams focused on snagging, defect management, and quality control alongside site records.

A UK-focused quality assurance and communication platform. Its strength is snagging and defects: observations are recorded instantly, tickets are linked to drawings, and quality checks and reports are compiled quickly. Works online and offline.

Where it wins: drawing-linked snagging and quality management, UK support in UK hours. Where it stops: a quality and defects tool first. The commercial side, NEC compensation events, time bars, and revenue recovery, is not what it is built for. Pricing posture: quote-based.

04

Also Worth a Look

If your search is broader than a pure site diary, a few more tools come up. Work Wallet and BauMaster both offer digital site diaries inside wider site-management suites. Procore includes daily logs as one module of an enterprise construction platform, and is worth a look only if you are buying a whole system for a large organisation rather than a diary. None of them detect compensation events from site records either, so treat them as field-documentation choices rather than commercial-recovery ones.

05

How to Choose

Buy for capture and you should be looking at Site Diary, Sitemate, Novade, or Raken, sorted by how much breadth and scale you need. Buy for speed and you will like BuildPass. Buy for quality and snagging and Ed Controls fits. Buy for drawings and tasks and Fieldwire makes sense.

Buy for recovery, because you are worried about missed compensation events and expired time bars on NEC or target-cost work, and Gather is the tool built for that job. Most serious UK commercial teams need capture and recovery. The cheapest mistake is assuming that because your diary looks tidy, it is also finding the money buried inside it. It is not, unless something is reading it.

Source: Gather Insights, the AI-powered site diary and commercial record management platform for UK construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is site diary software?

Site diary software is a tool that records what happened on a construction site each day, such as labour, plant, weather, progress, delays, and photos, in a single searchable system instead of a paper book or a Word file. The best tools also make those records easy to share and to rely on when a claim is disputed later.

What is the best site diary software?

There is no single best tool, because there are two jobs. For simple daily reporting, Site Diary, Sitemate, Novade, and Raken are strong. For UK teams on NEC or target-cost contracts who need the diary to detect compensation events before the eight-week time bar closes, Gather is purpose-built. Many teams weigh capture against commercial recovery.

Which site diary software is best for UK NEC4 contracts?

Gather is the only tool on this list built around NEC. It reads every diary entry with an AI QS agent and flags potential compensation events before the clause 61.3 eight-week time bar expires. The other tools record site activity well but have no NEC4 or time-bar awareness.

Does site diary software use AI?

Some does. BuildPass uses AI to turn voice notes into written diary entries and to summarise logs. Sitemate advertises AI-assisted diary creation, and Novade offers a separate AI suite. Gather goes further: its AI reads the finished diary to detect compensation events, identifying around 40% more than manual review.

How much does site diary software cost?

It varies by model. Sitemate publishes per-user rates from £20.52 to £66.42 per user per month, and Fieldwire is roughly £29 to £69 per user per month. Novade is free for small teams and quoted above that. Gather is priced per project rather than per seat. Because the models differ, ask each vendor to normalise a quote against your project count and user count before comparing.

What is the eight-week time bar in NEC4?

Under NEC4 clause 61.3, a contractor must notify a compensation event within eight weeks of becoming aware of it. Miss that deadline and you lose the right to additional time or money, however valid the underlying event was. A site diary that is read for events, not just filled in, is what protects that entitlement.

See what's hiding in your diaries

See what your site diaries are hiding

Gather's AI QS agent reads every diary entry and flags potential compensation events before the clause 61.3 time bar closes. 40% more compensation events found than manual review, and roughly 70% less diary admin.