Project GRIP Stages and Network Rail PACE Process Guide

Project overruns. Budget blowouts. Endless bureaucracy that adds months to delivery schedules.

If you've worked on rail infrastructure projects, you'll recognise these frustrations immediately. For over two decades, GRIP (Governance for Railway Investment Projects) promised structure but often delivered complexity that suffocated progress.

Now Network Rail has replaced GRIP entirely with PACE (Project Acceleration in a Controlled Environment). The early results suggest this isn't just another reorganisation exercise.

You'll discover exactly what PACE changes, why it matters for your projects, and whether this new approach could solve the delivery challenges that have plagued rail infrastructure for years.

What Actually Changed When GRIP Became PACE

GRIP served the rail industry since 2000, establishing eight distinct project stages from initial feasibility through to operational handback. While this provided clear governance, it also created what many considered excessive bureaucracy.

PACE emerged from Network Rail's board approval in November 2020, following extensive testing through Project SPEED (Swift, Pragmatic and Efficient Enhancement Delivery). The framework specifically addresses the government's COVID-19 recovery priorities: delivering public investment projects faster and for less money.

Mike Wright, Network Rail's Capital Investment Programme Director, explained the fundamental shift: "to keep the rigour of GRIP but not control projects so excessively that we are adding extra time and cost to the delivery."

The key difference lies in philosophy rather than just process. Where GRIP emphasised control through rigid stages, PACE prioritises acceleration through intelligent flexibility.

How PACE Streamlines Project Delivery

Simplified Project Structure PACE replaces GRIP's eight-stage linear progression with a more fluid approach that all departments can follow simultaneously. Instead of waiting for sign-offs between stages, teams can work in parallel where it makes sense.

Enhanced Decision-Making Authority The new framework pushes decision-making down to project teams rather than requiring multiple approval layers. This delegation reduces delays that previously occurred when minor decisions required escalation through several management tiers.

Integrated Risk Management Rather than treating risk assessment as a separate exercise, PACE embeds risk considerations throughout the project lifecycle. Teams identify and address potential issues continuously rather than at predetermined checkpoints.

Improved Resource Utilisation PACE enables better resource sharing between projects. Teams can apply lessons learned from one project immediately to others, rather than waiting for formal knowledge transfer processes.

Streamlined Procurement The framework creates more consistent procurement and contracting processes across different engineering disciplines, reducing the complexity that previously required separate approaches for civil, electrical, and mechanical works.

Real Results: The Dartmoor Railway Success Story

The restoration of the Dartmoor Railway Line demonstrates PACE in action. Led by Christian Irwin, Network Rail's Industry Programme Director, the project moved from concept to construction in just eight weeks.

This timeline represents a dramatic improvement over typical GRIP processes, which would have required months of stage gates and approvals before reaching detailed design. The line now carries regular passenger services after more than 50 years of closure.

The success stemmed from PACE's emphasis on early collaboration and reduced bureaucratic overhead. Instead of sequential approvals, teams worked together from feasibility through implementation, identifying and resolving issues in real time.

What PACE Means for Your Projects

Faster Decision Cycles You'll spend less time waiting for approvals and more time solving actual project challenges. PACE's delegated authority structure means decisions happen at the level where people understand the technical details.

Better Cross-Team Collaboration The framework encourages knowledge sharing between projects, so solutions developed for one challenge can benefit multiple teams simultaneously.

Real-Time Problem Solving Instead of waiting for formal review periods, PACE supports continuous adjustment based on emerging issues or opportunities.

Reduced Administrative Burden While maintaining necessary governance, PACE eliminates redundant documentation and approval processes that added time without improving outcomes.

Implementation Challenges You Should Expect

Cultural Adjustment Teams accustomed to GRIP's structured approach may initially struggle with PACE's increased flexibility and responsibility. Success requires training people to make decisions confidently rather than seeking approval for every choice.

Data Management Requirements PACE's effectiveness depends on real-time data availability. Projects need robust information systems to support faster decision-making without compromising accuracy.

Scaling Across Different Project Types While the Dartmoor Railway project succeeded brilliantly, scaling PACE's benefits across larger, more complex infrastructure projects presents ongoing challenges.

Maintaining Quality Standards Increased speed must not compromise safety or quality outcomes. Teams need clear guidelines about which decisions can be accelerated and which require traditional oversight.

‍

‍

Key Lessons for Infrastructure Project Management

PACE's emergence reflects broader industry recognition that excessive process control often hinders rather than helps project success. The most valuable aspects you can apply immediately include:

Delegate Authority Appropriately Push decision-making to the people who understand the technical details and consequences. Reserve higher-level approvals for truly strategic choices.

Emphasise Continuous Collaboration Break down silos between disciplines and project phases. Early collaboration prevents problems more effectively than rigorous reviews after issues emerge.

Invest in Real-Time Information Quality decision-making requires current, accurate data. Systems that provide real-time project visibility enable the faster response times that modern projects demand.

Balance Speed with Rigour Acceleration should not eliminate necessary checks and balances. Focus on removing bureaucratic delays while maintaining essential quality and safety oversight.

‍

PACE represents Network Rail's recognition that project management frameworks must evolve to meet modern delivery demands. By reducing bureaucratic overhead while maintaining essential governance, PACE has already demonstrated its potential through early successes like the Dartmoor Railway restoration.

The framework's emphasis on delegation, collaboration, and real-time decision-making offers valuable lessons for any organisation seeking to improve infrastructure project delivery. While implementation challenges exist, the potential benefits justify serious consideration for teams ready to embrace increased responsibility and faster decision cycles.

Whether you adopt PACE directly or apply its principles to your existing frameworks, the core message remains clear: effective project management prioritises outcomes over process complexity.

How might your current project management approach benefit from PACE's emphasis on speed and delegation?

‍

‍