Key Takeaways

The dividing date separates actual from forecast

Identify the dividing date from the applicable communication under clause 63.1 and use the programme and assessment rules required by the contract. Do not move the dividing date simply because a quotation is revised.

Progress the programme before assessing the CE

Establish actual progress and the programme position relevant to the assessment. Explain the effect of the compensation event on planned Completion and Key Dates using the applicable NEC4 ECC rules. A software rebaselining operation is not itself a contractual requirement.

There is no separate prolongation claim

Keep the notification and assessment of each compensation event current. Do not assume that a separate end-of-project prolongation claim will replace NEC4 ECC notification and assessment requirements. The treatment of a late or disputed assessment depends on the contract and facts.

A missing Accepted Programme affects the assessment route

A missing or unaccepted programme does not automatically extinguish compensation event entitlement. Apply the Project Manager assessment provisions in clauses 64.1 and 64.2 where their conditions are met. Check the separate first-programme payment provision rather than assuming every unaccepted update permits a 25% deduction.

Further Reading

GMH Planning’s own guidance notes, CECA bulletins and webinar pages on this topic. They explain the standard provisions and are useful alongside, not instead of, the executed contract.

Check the contract form, edition, incorporated amendments, main and secondary options, Contract Data and any Z clauses for your own project.

Session Transcript
Read More

Audience Q&A