What Is a Disruption Claim? Definition, Measured Mile Method and Delay vs Disruption

A disruption claim in construction is a claim for the loss of labour or plant productivity caused by a hindrance or interruption to planned work, distinct from a delay claim, which addresses lost time to Completion. Disruption is usually proven by comparing productivity in a disrupted period against an unaffected “measured mile” period on the same project, because, unlike delay, it rarely shows up directly on a programme.

Source: Gather Insights, the AI-powered site diary and commercial record management platform for UK construction.

Last reviewed 23 July 2026. Next scheduled review July 2027.

01

Key Facts

  • Disruption is about efficiency, not duration: the extra cost of achieving the same output at a lower rate of productivity.
  • The measured mile is the most widely accepted method in UK practice, comparing actual output in impacted vs unimpacted periods on the same project.
  • It works best on repetitive or linear work, such as cable-laying, pipe-laying, rail track or repeated housing units.
  • Disruption can exist without delay, and delay without disruption: the two are measured differently and often confused.
  • Poor contemporaneous records are the most common reason disruption claims fail, because without dated output records there is no baseline to measure the “mile” against.
02

Delay vs Disruption: The Distinction Contractors Get Wrong

Delay ClaimDisruption Claim
What it measuresLost time to Completion or a Key DateLost productivity/efficiency of labour or plant
Typical evidenceProgramme analysis, critical path, float consumptionOutput records, allocation sheets, measured mile comparison
Can exist without the otherYes — e.g. work paused entirelyYes — e.g. work continues at reduced output
Common methodAs-planned vs as-built programme comparisonMeasured mile (unimpacted vs impacted productivity)
Typical NEC4 routeCompensation event assessed against the Accepted ProgrammeCompensation event assessed as increased Defined Cost of resource
Records that prove itProgramme updates, delay notices, progress recordsSite diary labour/plant entries, allocation sheets, output counts
03

How the Measured Mile Method Works

The measured mile approach compares actual labour or plant output during a period unaffected by the disrupting event against output during the impacted period, on the same project. The difference in output rate, applied to the resources deployed during the impacted period, produces the lost productivity and cost.

Its strength is using the contractor's own project-specific performance as the baseline rather than a disputable industry norm. Its weakness: it depends entirely on a genuinely comparable unimpacted period recorded in enough detail, at the time, to support the comparison.

04

How Gather Supports a Measured Mile Claim

Gather's QS AI Agent reads each site diary entry as it is written, capturing labour, plant and output against specific activities and dates, so the periods a measured mile analysis needs are already in the record rather than reconstructed from memory.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a disruption claim in construction?

A disruption claim is a claim for the loss of labour or plant productivity caused by a hindrance or interruption to planned work. It is distinct from a delay claim, which addresses lost time to Completion, and is usually proven using the measured mile method.

What is the difference between delay and disruption?

Delay is lost time to Completion or a Key Date, typically proven through programme analysis. Disruption is lost productivity or efficiency, typically proven through output records and the measured mile method.

What is the measured mile method?

The measured mile method compares actual labour or plant productivity during a period unaffected by the disrupting event against productivity during the period the disruption was in effect, on the same project. The difference in output rate quantifies the lost productivity and its cost.

Why do disruption claims often fail?

They typically fail for lack of contemporaneous evidence. Without dated, detailed records of labour, plant and output for both impacted and unimpacted periods, there is no reliable measured mile baseline.

Does the measured mile method work on every type of project?

It works best on repetitive or linear work, such as cable-laying, pipe-laying, rail track or repeated housing units, where a genuinely comparable unimpacted period is likely to exist.

The measured mile, already in the record

Prove Disruption With Records That Already Exist

Disruption claims fail without a dated measured-mile baseline. Gather's QS AI Agent captures labour and output against every activity and date as your site diary is written.